|
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
GOVERNMENT OFFERS LITTLE DEFENSE FOR CUTTING FUNDING
FOR SEX REASSIGNMENT SURGERY (SRS) AT ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS
TRIBUNAL HEARING
Toronto: Lawyers, lobby groups, unions, and transsexual and
transgender
people gathered today at Queen's Park to urge the Liberal Government
to
restore funding for SRS. On October 1, 1998 the Provincial
government
removed funding for Sex Reassignment Surgery without consultation
with
medical professionals or the transsexual community. On Tuesday,
April
19,
2005 an Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Hearing concluded its lengthy
proceedings on whether cutting funding was discriminatory.
"The sex reassignment case is an important and precedent setting
case,"
said Susan Ursel, lawyer for three of the complainants. "It is the
first Trans
case to be heard by the Tribunal in Ontario and it deals with the
provision of
medical surgical care, an issue important to us all. This is also
the
story of
everyday people trying to live their lives, work, and find
friendship
and love,
despite the misunderstanding and sometimes outright vilification for
being
transsexuals. The complainants have found the personal strength to
take
on
the government's discrimination and it has been a true honour to
represent
my clients."
Cynthia Petersen, lawyer for Michelle Josef, who has filed a Charter
Challenge regarding the cutting of SRS funding, said "Michelle
Josef's
case
is not only about ensuring that the Ontario government treats
transsexuals
with equal dignity and respect, it is also about protecting the
integrity of our
provincial health care system, which is supposed to provide
universal
insurance coverage for all medically necessary procedures."
Egale representative, Hilary Cook, added, "Despite the fact that SRS
is
a
medically necessary service funded by province since 1969, the
former
Conservative government cut funding in 1998. This decision has a
serious
impact upon this traditionally vulnerable group. Transsexual people
deserve
access to essential medical procedures on an equal footing with all
Ontarians."
"As a transwoman," stated Susan Gapka, of the Rainbow Health
Network,
"I
continue to pressure the government to fund this essential medical
service.
At the Tribunal Hearings I testified that despite this ongoing
lobbying, there
still remains no public funding for SRS in Ontario. For me, SRS is
essential
for completing the transition process from male to female, and yet,
I
cannot
afford the procedure due to the cut in funding."
Martine Stonehouse, one of four complainants who brought forward the
Tribunal Case added, "A strong government and its Premier takes the
lead,
champions equity issues, and supports marginalized people. I appeal
to
Premier McGuinty to do the right thing and fund our surgery."
Michelle Josef also said, "Our politicians are too slow in accepting
our rights
and that is why we are taking our case to the courts. The time has
come
for
society to live up its human rights obligations and accept
transpersons
as
equal members. The work we are doing now will translate
into equality for future generations."
"In endorsing the reinstatement of Sexual Reassignment Surgery,"
declared
Anna Travers of the Sherbourne Health Centre, "our Centre encourages
a
more open and respectful approach to comprehensive health care for
our
trans communities. If qualified professionals across the province
are
able to
offer assessments and approval letters for surgery, transsexual
people
could receive better services in a timely and efficient way."
Representatives from the Rainbow Health Network (Reference Group of
the
Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Ontario), Egale Canada,
Canadian
Union of Public Employees, Sherbourne Health Centre, and the
Canadian
Federation of Students - Ontario were in attendance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|